Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers
Friday, November 06, 2009
|
|
Just Clueless
|
|
Posted by:
Carol Platt Liebau at
5:20 PM
|
As Garrett points out below, Robert A. George makes some good points in discussing President Obama's incredibly dismissive initial reaction to yesterday's shootings at Fort Hood.
Today, the President tried it again. Sadly, the results weren't much better. Speaking this morning, President Obama's main message to an American public reeling from this act of mass murder was an admoninition to avoid "jumping to conclusions before we have all the facts."
Now, it's refreshing to see how much the President has learned since his own display of "jumping to conclusions" last summer, when the matter concerned his friend, Professor Gates, and Gates' allegations of racism against a white police officer.
But with the warning about "jumping to conclusions" this morning, we all know what Obama's really saying here: Look, you bigots, don't start making the ugly assumptions you're prone to making, just because the killer was Muslim.
It's all very reminiscent of a few of the nitwits in the wake of 9/11, whose primary (and unjustified) concern seemed to be that a bunch of haters would immediately start lynching anyone of Arab descent in this county in response to the attacks on America.
And it's remarkable how little insight this President has about the true nature of the country he leads, does he?
|
|
|
Friday, November 06, 2009
|
|
Teachable Moments from the Rose Garden
|
|
Posted by:
Meredith Jessup at
3:39 PM
|
In response to yesterday's shooting at Fort Hood, President Obama had the following to say regarding public suspicions:
"We don't know all the answers yet. And I would caution against jumping to conclusions until we have all the facts."
Barack Obama sure has come a long way since July when he had the following to say regarding the arrest of his friend, Harvard Professor Henry Gates:
"I don’t know – not having been there and not seeing all the facts – what role race played in that, but I think it’s fair to say, number one, any of us would be pretty angry; number two that he Cambridge police acted stupidly in arresting somebody when there was already proof that they were in their own home."
Well done, Mr. President!
|
|
|
Friday, November 06, 2009
|
|
Obama's Disgraceful Friday Photo-Op
|
|
Posted by:
Meredith Jessup at
11:54 AM
|
As of yesterday, President Obama was scheduled to spend Friday afternoon on Capitol Hill, rallying the troops for tomorrow House health care vote at 6:00pm. But following yesterday's tragic shooting at Fort Hood, it looks like plans have changed.
The White House schedule now says that the president will be making his trip to Capitol Hill tomorrow and visiting Walter Reed Army Medical Center--his first visit since taking office in January. According to the AP, White House officials are claiming the plans to visit Walter Reed before yesterday's shooting. But if this were true, why would the president be delaying his trip to Capitol Hill to go to Walter Reed? I doubt his schedulers double-booked him.
In addition, the White House is insisting the visit to Walter Reed has nothing to do with yesterday's shooting. Doubtful. The president is under fire today after his "frightening insensitivity" toward the Fort Hood shooting yesterday as he spoke before a group at the White House.
This whole situation is similar to his last military photo-op, saluting America's fallen soldiers as they returned home to rest. If it were to show gratitude and pay tribute to our military personnel, why not turn the cameras off? What kind of solemn reflection can one have with flashbulbs going off?
Undoubtedly, today's visit to Walter Reed will also include the WH press pool following behind the president. Obama's "spontaneous" visit to Walter Reed today is nothing more than a hollow, calculated political maneuver and photo-op and is disgraceful in light of the tremendous sacrifice our men and women in uniform make on a daily basis.
|
|
|
Thursday, November 05, 2009
|
|
Homosexual Hate Monger Plays Palin In Drag On MSNBC
|
|
Posted by:
Greg Hengler at
1:01 PM
|
Remember this clown? How could you forget his hate-filled misogynistic Carrie Prejean diatribe on MSNBC's "Countdown" with Keith Olbermann? I did not think it was possible, but this segment is more disturbing -- and I won't even try to describe why because I would have to watch it again. You'll have to watch it -- if you dare. And, yes, homosexual Musto some how manages to take a last-second shot at Prejean.
Reminder: This is an Obama-approved "news" network.
|
|
|
Wednesday, November 04, 2009
|
|
2012: Disasters Strike Christianity, Fear Islam
|
|
Posted by:
Kevin Glass at
5:06 PM
|
|
2012, the big disaster movie starring John Cusack (that looks to be a disaster... seriously, the movie just looks bad) is about the end of the world and, as I'm sure you've all seen in the previews, uses a wide variety of special effects to destroy most of the world.
Director Roland Emmerich said he had great fun taking a CGI powered swipe at some of the world's landmarks, especially Christian houses of worship and symbols. But a major Muslim holy site managed to escape destruction.
On St. Peter's Basilica:
"Why ... don't [we] have the church fall on people's head?" Emmerich said. He added: "The whole Vatican kind of tips and kind of rolls over the people. It said something, because in the story, some people ... believe in praying and prayer, and they pray in front of the church, and it's probably the wrong thing, what they would do in that situation."
The movie goes on to destroy the Sistine Chapel and Christ the Redeemer statue in Rio de Janeiro, the director says, "because I'm against organized religion."
The one that got away? Mecca. Even the Hollywood anti-religion director didn't want to draw the Jihadist ire of Muslims:
"My co-writer Harald said I will not have a fatwa on my head because of a movie. And he was right. ... We have to all ... in the Western world ... think about this. You can actually ... let ... Christian symbols fall apart, but if you would do this with [an] Arab symbol, you would have ... a fatwa."
He said he "wanted to" show the destruction of Mecca, but was worried about violent repercussions against him.
|
|
|
Wednesday, November 04, 2009
|
|
Fox Isn't A News Channel? At Least They Provide Coverage Of The News.
|
|
Posted by:
Jillian Bandes at
12:19 PM
|
|
I wasn't watching MSNBC last night, but Geraghty was. Ha, ha, ha:
It is pretty darn astounding that with all of the insistence from the White House that Fox News Channel is "not a real news network," their preferred channel, MSNBC, did not have live coverage at 10 p.m. Eastern on ELECTION NIGHT. They reran Olbermann's 8 p.m. coverage, which was, of course, two hours out of date. No, really, when you stop covering the news, people can legitimately say you're not a news network. That has nothing to do with percieved bias or ideology (although we can speculate as to why Olbermann disappeared from the 10 p.m. coverage, where he was previously expected); it's because you're not actually bringing any new information to viewers.
|
|
|
Tuesday, November 03, 2009
|
|
AIM: Rev. Wright Calls America, "land of the greed and home of the slave."
|
|
Posted by:
Matt Lewis at
2:40 PM
|
Accuracy in Media's (AIM) Cliff Kincaid has uncovered a new video of Rev. Jeremiah Wright, which shows him,
... praising Marxism and discussing his ties to communists in El Salvador and Nicaragua and the Libyan government. Equally important, Wright is being introduced in the video by Robert W. McChesney, co-founder of Free Press, an organization which has come under scrutiny for its links to the Obama Administration and dedication to the transformation and control of the private media in the U.S. More Kincaid on Wright's comments ...
He called America "land of the greed and home of the slave."
Read the whole thing here. Also please note this:
*Editor's Note: The Wright video linked to in Cliff Kincaid's column, Controversial New Video of Obama's Pastor, has been deleted. But the same video can still be viewed on YouTube in three parts. Here are part one, part two, and part three. We do not know why the original video was taken down, but have our suspicions.
|
|
|
Tuesday, November 03, 2009
|
|
Why Do We Vote on Tuesday?
|
|
Posted by:
Meredith Jessup at
2:08 PM
|
Why Tuesday?
In 1845, before Florida, California, and Texas were states or slavery had been abolished, Congress needed to pick a time for Americans to vote. We were an agrarian society. We traveled by horse and buggy. Farmers needed a day to get to the county seat, a day to vote, and a day to get back, without interfering with the three days of worship. So that left Tuesday and Wednesday, but Wednesday was market day. So, Tuesday it was. In 1875 Congress extended the Tuesday date for national House elections and in 1914 for federal Senate elections.
|
|
|
Monday, November 02, 2009
|
|
NYTimes' Frank Rich: "The GOP Stalinists Invade Upstate New York"
|
|
Posted by:
Meredith Jessup at
10:37 PM
|
New York Times liberal columnist Frank Rich graces us all with his pre-election "insight":
Barack Obama’s most devilish political move since the 2008 campaign was to appoint a Republican congressman from upstate New York as secretary of the Army. This week’s election to fill that vacant seat has set off nothing less than a riotous and bloody national G.O.P. civil war. No matter what the results in that race on Tuesday, the Republicans are the sure losers. This could be a gift that keeps on giving to the Democrats through 2010, and perhaps beyond.
The governors’ races in New Jersey and Virginia were once billed as the marquee events of Election Day 2009 -- a referendum on the Obama presidency and a possible Republican “comeback.” But preposterous as it sounds, the real action migrated to New York’s 23rd, a rural Congressional district abutting Canada. That this pastoral setting could become a G.O.P. killing field, attracting an all-star cast of combatants led by Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck, William Kristol and Newt Gingrich, is a premise out of a Depression-era screwball comedy. But such farces have become the norm for the conservative movement -- whether the participants are dressing up in full “tea party” drag or not.
The battle for upstate New York confirms just how swiftly the right has devolved into a wacky, paranoid cult that is as eager to eat its own as it is to destroy Obama. The movement’s undisputed leaders, Palin and Beck, neither of whom has what Palin once called the “actual responsibilities” of public office, would gladly see the Republican Party die on the cross of right-wing ideological purity. Over the short term, at least, their wish could come true...
Read More...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your Blog Postings:
|
|
Last updated 2 Minutes 49 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 50 Minutes 4 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 50 Minutes 53 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 51 Minutes 39 Seconds Ago
|
|
Last updated 52 Minutes 17 Seconds Ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs
|
|
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall
|
|
|
|
|
|
|