NEWS TALK RADIO Our Hosts
Powered by: Townhall.com
Sign Up

Townhall.com The Blogspot for Political, Conservative and Republican Blogs and Bloggers


Thursday, July 03, 2008
WEASLEY'S "JUDGMENT"
Posted by: Michael Medved at 12:08 AM

Let’s leave aside for a moment General Weasley Clark’s increasingly embarrassing attempts to defend his “Face the Nation” claim that “his hero” John McCain is actually unqualified for the presidency. 

When asked by a half-dozen interviewers to specify one area in which his candidate, Barack Obama, is actually MORE qualified than McCain, the Weasley One always returns to the same word – “judgment.” Obama’s qualified, in other words, because he displayed better judgment than McCain on the issue of the Iraq War. 

But there’s an obvious follow-up to this argument that General Clark hasn’t yet faced.. 

He suggests that “judgment” is more important than military experience, or political background or anything else, and that Barack deserves support because he opposed the war that McCain favored.

Okay, Weasel Man, then the unavoidable question is ---

Why did you support HILLARY CLINTON for the Democratic nomination?

If judgment is the key issue, and the main measure of judgment involves the decision on going to war in Iraq, then how could you support Hillary over Barack?

By the standard you use today – supporting the war showed horrible judgment, and opposing it showed wisdom and courage --- wasn’t Hillary every bit as “wrong” as McCain in her support of the President’s decision to go to war?

But you supported her. Why? Her superior military experience? Her unalloyed heroism in dodging that Bosnian sniper fire?

And one more question, Weasley, while we’re at it---

You say you back Barack over McCain because of his superior qualifications as evidenced by his judgment on the war.

But on what basis did you back Hillary over McCain—given that they showed the same judgment on the war?

The real answer is obvious: the Weasel Man wants to get a place on the ticket as a candidate for Vice President and Hillary looked like his best bet. He shifted his allegiance to Obama in time to make that candidate’s short list.

He might even have preserved his chances had he simply and immediately acknowledged that he “misspoke” on Face the Nation in belittling McCain’s military service (23 years in uniform, including eight years after he returned from ‘Nam).

Yup, the Weasley One might have saved his shot for the Vice Presidency by a timely, open-hearted apology and correction. But that kind of sincere, direct acknowledgement of an obvious mistake (see “Jindal, Bobby”) requires a bit of class, smarts and grace, qualities which General Clark in no way possesses.

Even by the low standards of slippery and silly Democrats, the ol’ Weasler is an outright embarrassment.





Your Blog Postings:
Last updated 18 Minutes 56 Seconds Ago
Last updated 25 Minutes 12 Seconds Ago
Last updated 1 Hours 2 Minutes 4 Seconds Ago
Last updated 1 Hours 5 Minutes 25 Seconds Ago
Last updated 1 Hours 23 Minutes 8 Seconds Ago
 

Archives of our Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs

Blog Search



Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Townhall Blogs
Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Columns Columns
Your Townhall Conservative, Republican, Political Blogs Your Blogs
By Month
 July 2009
 June 2009
 May 2009
 April 2009
 March 2009
 February 2009
 January 2009
 December 2008
 November 2008
 October 2008
 September 2008
 August 2008
 July 2008
 June 2008
 May 2008
 April 2008
 March 2008
 February 2008
By Issue
 A Culture of Life
 Budget & Government
 Campaigns & Elections
 Education
 Energy & Environment
 Faith & Family
 Foreign Affairs
 Health Care
 Immigration
 Jobs & Economy
 Judges & Courts
 Media & Culture
 Property Rights
 Safety & Security
 Science & Technology
 Second Amendment
 Social Security
 Tax Relief
Advertisement

Comments Comments

WHITES HAVE DONE IT ..... AGAIN!!!
 Re: Thank you Sarah
  By aphone
WHITES HAVE DONE IT ..... AGAIN!!!
 Re: Thank you Sarah
  By aphone
Agree with above
 Re: "If Palin wants to run in 2012, why not do exactly what she announced today?"
  By concord2123
Great Depression Pt#5 - Pat Lib
 Re: Why Do They Hate Her?
  By BK
Great Depression Pt#4 - Pat Lib
 Re: Why Do They Hate Her?
  By BK
Great Depression Pt#3 - Pat Lib
 Re: Why Do They Hate Her?
  By BK
Rahm & Barry (&McCain) are smiling
 Re: A Hard Choice, But The Right One
  By PAT
Great Depression PT#2 - Pat Lib
 Re: Why Do They Hate Her?
  By BK
Great Depression - Pat Lib
 Re: Why Do They Hate Her?
  By BK
She Quit - Barracuda to Quitter
 Re: A Hard Choice, But The Right One
  By PAT
I agree in part....
 Re: "If Palin wants to run in 2012, why not do exactly what she announced today?"
  By Allen Caeden
I second the huh?
 Re: "If Palin wants to run in 2012, why not do exactly what she announced today?"
  By Reason
Pat Lib pontificates:
 Re: Why Do They Hate Her?
  By BK
Pat lIb sneers:
 Re: Why Do They Hate Her?
  By BK
Huh?
 Re: "If Palin wants to run in 2012, why not do exactly what she announced today?"
  By Cicero
Jillian Bandes 8:43 PM
 Re: "If Palin wants to run in 2012, why not do exactly what she announced today?"
  By Bob Munck
GOOD On You, Sarah !
 Re: Thank you Sarah
  By NeoConScum
PL is in denial:
 Re: Kingmaker Palin
  By Homer
The answer lies with us.
 Re: Kingmaker Palin
  By Tim
Pathetic-Lib doesn't know if He or She?
 Re: Kingmaker Palin
  By Legally Remove BO

The Latest on Town HallThe Latest on Town Hall


Blog Roll Blog Roll