NEWS TALK RADIO Our Hosts
Powered by: Townhall.com
Sign Up
Thursday, July 24, 2008
Laura Donovan :: Townhall.com Columnist
“Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” Hearing Stimulates Heated Discussion
by Laura Donovan
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
Who do you blame the most for this years budget impasse?



“We must carefully review a policy that rejects otherwise suitable military candidates,” said Congresswoman Susan Davis, Chair of the Military Personnel Subcommittee on Wednesday’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” Hearing.

Three former military officers testified against the policy that has dismissed over 12,500 men and women from the armed forces since its implementation in 1993.

Homosexuality was not the only issue discussed. Speaking out against the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy, U.S. Army Major General Vance Coleman compared the policy to discriminatory policies he experienced when he enlisted in 1948.

“It only mattered that I was black,” Coleman said. “I’m grateful to encourage Congress to repeal “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” and allow the best and the brightest to serve.”

Two of the military officers discussed the difficulties they faced as homosexuals in the military.

“Whenever I got a call from the military higher-ups, I feared I’d somehow been outed and was about to get fired,” said U.S. Navy Captain Joan E. Darrah.

At “19 and gay,” Former Marine Staff Sgt. Eric F. Alva enlisted before the implementation of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”

“I probably served a country not proud of me,” Alva said of his service in the Iraq war. “In my experiences, “‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ is outdated.” Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Laura Donovan is an editorial intern with Townhall.com.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Laura Donovan's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Subject: that's right, you moron



Gays already serve in the military. What we're talking about is whether they can have a photo of their boyfriend on their desks

Very true. THEY CAN'T. Is that too much to ask of a soldier? If he can risk his life, why can't he stop mooning at his boyfriend? Why can't he act like a man for a change?

Let me add my kudos for bob
Nice, reasonable posts. Thank you.

It was my understanding that "fraternization" was not permitted. This refers specifically to between the ranks, I think, and is intended to prevent exactly the kind of scenario (acting in the personal interest, not of the troop) you describe. If my understanding is correct, then this rule can be extended to apply to relationships between men.

Second, you are right that bureaucratic monstrosities would make it hard to remove the 30 men. (This is why incompetents get promoted into other divisions in a business--just get rid of him.) However, in this case we have a compelling state interest in equal rights.

Remember: Gays already serve in the military. What we're talking about is whether they can have a photo of their boyfriend on their desks.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email:
*