NEWS TALK RADIO Our Hosts
Powered by: Townhall.com
Sign Up
Thursday, July 24, 2008
Ken Blackwell :: Townhall.com Columnist
In Quality Education Family Matters
by Ken Blackwell
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
[+] Text [-]
 
Poll
How Was Your Line to Vote?



Senators McCain and Obama both say public schools need work, but neither of their proposed solutions gets to the root problem of our education crisis.

Mr. McCain has supported President Bushs No Child Left Behind policy, albeit with qualifications, calling the policy a good beginning but maintaining that there are a lot of things that need to be fixed. He plans to fix many of these problems with financial incentives, distributed in a decentralized, entrepreneurial network of schools.

At the NAACP convention last week, Mr. McCain promised to expand school choice, Opportunity Scholarships, and alternative certification for teachers. Another of his solutions for failing school systems linking student test scores to teacher pay runs afoul of the national teachers unions, but Mr. Obama supports the idea as well, as long as teachers participate in designing the plans.

Mr. Obama showed less sympathy for No Child Left Behind. He told an American Federation of Teachers conference his education reform would start by fixing the broken promises of the policy. His solution is put a lot more taxpayer money into what he called a failed program.

Unlike Mr. McCain, Mr. Obama plans to increase financial support, rather than financial incentives, as the solution to school woes. And he has disparaged Mr. McCains votes against funding increases for education and his tired rhetoric about vouchers and school choice.

The newly elected president of the AFT, Randi Weingarten, does not think Mr. Obamas funding increases are enough to turn around underperforming schools.

The folks who believe that this can all be done on teachers shoulders, which is what No Child tries to do, are doing a huge disservice to America, Ms. Weingarten said in her July 14 address to the AFT.

Ms. Weingarten envisions a future in which a wide variety of community functions take place under the umbrella of the public school.

Imagine if schools had the educational resources children need to thrive, like smaller classes and individualized instruction, plentiful, up-to-date materials and technology anchored to that rich curriculum, decent facilities, an early start for toddlers and a nurturing atmosphere, Ms. Weingarten said. Continued...

1 2
| Full Article & Comments | Next >
Share:
Vote on It:
Average Vote:
 
About The Author
Mr. Blackwell, contributing editor of Townhall.com, is a senior fellow at the Family Research Council, the American Civil Rights Union and the Buckeye Institute in Ohio.
 
TOWNHALL DAILY: Be the first to read Ken Blackwell's column. Sign up today and receive Townhall.com daily lineup delivered each morning to your inbox.
Subject: the philosophy of accountablility
edna wrote:

"Schools administration and teachers need to be held accountable as homeschool parents…"

What do you mean? Do you mean the government should stop being hypocritical and hold itself to the same standards as regulated homeschoolers? Are you saying that government regulation of homeschoolers is good and that same regulation would be good for government institutions? (I'm not sure I explained the difference between those two questions clearly.)

I think there does need to be a conversation about accountability, but I think it needs to be made on behalf of the taxpayers and parents. I think it should go like this:

1. Children are the responsibility of their parents. That responsibility includes seeing to it that each of their children is educated.

2. If a parent chooses to hire someone to educate their children on the parents' behalf, the parent must pay for it. (Either through taxes to the public system, through tuition to another institution, or by hiring a tutor.)

3. Anyone educating a child (private institution, government institution or private tutor) is accountable to the parent who hired them.

4. If taxpayers are communally hiring a government institution to educate children, there must be an accounting to the taxpayers for the academic performance of the children.

That's why regulation of homeschoolers is not necessary. The parent already knows how the child is doing academically. The parent is footing the bill themselves-not spending other people's money for a service.

Private schools are educating students whose parents voluntarily send their children there and can at any time remove them and send them elsewhere (in theory, anyway) and that's a real form of accountability.

What type of accountability mechanism can be implemented in government schools on behalf of parents whose children they educate and to the taxpayers who have hired them?

Subject: Edna in NC
Edna, you rock!

I'd also recommend adding school uniforms to all public schools. This is something that I hated the idea of when I was in school, but it would have helped. It levels the playing field a little between the rich and poor kids. It would also keep out gang colors and things like that.
Sign Up to Post Your CommentsSign Up to Post Your Comments
If you are already registered, click here to login. Otherwise, please take a few seconds to register with Townhall.com. Once you sign up, you’ll be able to post your comments immediately, use the action center, get podcasts, and more!
Note: Fields marked with a red asterisk (*) are required.
Salutation:
First Name:
*
Last Name:
*
Email: